by Scott Cox
posted Jan 20 2014 3:48PM
People are wondering if this ridiculous bridge scandal will be the end of New Jersey Governor Chris Christie's presidential aspirations. The correct answer is yes, but maybe not for the obvious reason. Look, this act of political vengeance has triggered the old what-did-he-know-and-when-did-he-know-it routine, and Christie has decided to go all Sgt. Schultz on everybody. He knows nothing, which may well be the case. But it won't help. People have had it with this kind of politics, and even if Christie really didn't know about it, it all went on right under his nose, which is worse for a lot of folks. And we don't have to wait for the investigations to finish up, either. The fact is that the Tea Party wants this guy out of the race just as much as the democrats do, which explains why nobody wants to be seen as coming to his aid. When George Soros AND the Koch Brothers are gunning for you, you're done. And now we all get to watch Christie let this scandal drag him under, and Hillary has seen her first challenger cut down before anyone even declared that they were running. Christie probably won't bother.
by Scott Cox
posted Dec 8 2013 3:05PM
I guess it's just part of the character of our little town, but as usual we have an epidemic of people taking the handicapped parking spaces at shopping centers around Christmastime. Great. Look, it's bad enough at any time of the year, but during December it just seems like a bigger infraction. Those spaces are for actual handicapped people, who, just like the rest of us, have to get shopping done. The fine is steep, but not nearly steep enough. I'd like to see a system where the offender isn't fined at all. Let's just crush their kneecaps with a ball peen hammer. Then they're free to keep the plaquard. Reports of idiots either parking in the handicapped spots without the proper designation are up, as are the number of idiots who use plaquards intended for other people. EIther way, it's an incredibly low-class move, and it needs to stop. It's like our litter problem. We're better than this. At least I hope we are.
by Scott Cox
posted Dec 1 2013 11:30AM
It looks like the history of wacky business ventures in Bakersfield has a new chapter. Interstate Bus has called it quits after one week of business. One week! After Airport Bus decided to stop losing money on shuttling people to and from LAX, Interstate came to town to take over the route. And, after 7 whole days of service, they're out. No kidding.The owner says that it's because Bakersfield customers pay in cash, and his company prefers to deal in credit. This might be the first business owner in history to turn his nose up at cash. I seriously doubt that cash is the reason for the hasty exit. They drove 300 people to LA, about a third for Thanksgiving. Apparently you can't make money doing that at $32 a head. Who knew? I hope we all find out what really went on with this deal, but i'm sure i'm not the only one not buying the official story. I do know this- if you need a ride to LAX, you're on your own. Again.
by Scott Cox
posted Nov 20 2013 5:39PM
Remember those X-ray specs we all wanted to order from old comic books as kids but never did? Well i've spent the last several days with Google Glass, which is way more advanced than anything out of any comic book. They let you take pictures, shoot video, surf the web, make calls- pretty much anything your cellphone does, but in a much more immediate way. I don't know if these things will replace cellphones, but i'm betting a lot of people will opt for them. Think about driving down the road, getting your directions pumped directly into your head, or posting pictures to social media just by looking at stuff. This is either scary-cool, or just scary. Just remember that as this new technology gets smaller and cheaper (the current price is $1500), more and more people will be wearing them. You'll never know who if someone is looking in your direction, or recording your every move. This aises some serious and immediate privacy issues. Between computer glasses, drones, sattelite cameras and govenrment phone monitoring, we're living the golden age for the paranoid. Let's hope that these glasses are used for good and not for evil. Hey- we can hope.
by Scott Cox
posted Oct 1 2013 10:07AM
This week saw Sen. Ted Cruz, Republican from Texas, speak for 21 hours plus on why his fellow republicans should vote to defund Obamacare. He also mixed in some Star Wars references and a reading of Green Eggs And Ham. Nice. Had he kept yammering for another couple of hours, he would have passed up the times of the all-time filibuster kings- Wayne Morse from Oregon went 22 hours plus in 1953, trying to stop something called the Tidelands Oil Bill, and Alfonse D'Amato, who bloviated for 23 hours plus against the military spending bill of 1986. Had Cruz wasted an entire day (plus 18 minutes, he would have broken the filibuster record, held by Strom Thurmond, who spent all that time in his effort to derail the 1957 civil rights bill. The problem is, Cruz wouldn't have been eligible anyway. His singular act of defiance wasn't technically a filibuster. It was more of a profile-raising exercise for his future political aspirations. And it will work. People admire that kind of political theater. Well, half do. See, people see these stupid things as some kind of one-man battle against tyranny, or oppression or whatever. I blame Jimmy Stewart. If his character, Jefferson Smith, hadn't been so engaging in Mr. Smith Goes To Washington, we probably wouldn't tolerate filibusters at all. They're basically just a way to exploit a loophole that allows elected officials to blabber on until the clock runs out on a debate. Like a basketball player dribbling for an hour after his team goes up 2-0. The Senate needs a shot clock.
Here's the truth about filibusters- our founding fathers didn't write them into the Constitution at all. They're a loophole, discovered by a Senator named John Calhoun in 1841. He discovered that there was no rule forcing him to stop, so he just kept going until there was no time for dissent. And he did it all in defense of slavery. No wonder filibusters are evil. They started out that way. The reason I say that only half of people hate these things is because they're only frowned upon when used by the party you didn't vote for. I'll wager that most of the people who were cheering Ted Cruz on were not quite so supportive of D'Amato in '86, or more recently when Democrat Wendy Davis went 13 hours straight on the floor of the Texas State Housetrying to stop Texas' sweeping abortion bill. Conversely, the folks who hailed her as heroic were likely unimpressed when fellow Texan Cruz took his shot. The reason these filibusters are so ridiculous is that they never work. Davis knew she had no chance to derail that Texas abortion bill, and Ted Cruz, fresh off his filibuster, promptly voted with the democrats on Obamacare. And, interestingly enough, Davis will be running for Governor in Texas, and i'm sure that Cruz has greater political aspirations as well. And they'll always be known for their personal contributions to the phony, idiotic bit of political grandstanding known as the filibuster. Thanks a lot, Jimmy Stewart.